AWS APN & Migration Engagements · Kubernetes modernization

Enterprise IT monitoring · VMware Tanzu to EKS assessment

An AWS MAP Assess evaluation for a European IT monitoring enterprise, transitioning VMware Tanzu Kubernetes to Amazon EKS with Karpenter and a TCO analysis.

Project
AWS APN & Migration Engagements
Capability
Migration & strategy
Stack
Amazon EKS · VMware Tanzu · Karpenter · AWS Transform · RVTools · Dell VxRail · AWS MAP
Tags
kubernetes · eks · tanzu · vmware · migration · map-assess · karpenter · finops
Reading time
3 min
Published

At a glance

Problem
A European enterprise IT infrastructure and network monitoring software leader operated its core commercial platforms, continuous integration runner fleets, and extensive QA test farms across on-premises Dell VxRail clusters running VMware Tanzu. Facing impending hypervisor licensing price increases and substantial physical colocation datacenter lease overheads, the organization initiated an AWS Migration Acceleration Program (MAP) assessment. The initiative required deep container-level discovery, VPC CNI IP capacity planning, stateful data persistence mapping, and an audited 3-year TCO financial justification to validate a complete datacenter exit.
Approach
Serving as Lead Cloud Architect, led the technical workload assessment and EKS target state architecture. Built a 33-question evaluation matrix spanning container resource requests/limits, network policies, and pod storage drivers. Designed the target AWS platform transitioning VMware Tanzu workloads to Amazon EKS using Karpenter with AWS Graviton and Spot instances, mapped relational databases to Amazon Aurora, and authored the compute right-sizing report (projecting ≥ 25% compute savings) and official AWS MAP Customer Sign-Off package.
What this enables
Decouples the enterprise from restrictive on-premises hypervisor licensing, automates container autoscaling via Karpenter on modern Graviton processors, and establishes the plan for retiring the colocation datacenter cleanly.

Key results

≥ 25%
Projected compute cost reduction via EKS right-sizing and Karpenter
100%
VMware Tanzu workloads mapped to cloud-native Amazon EKS
Official
AWS MAP Customer Sign-Off package validated and delivered
Kubernetes modernization

Assessing VMware Tanzu workloads, Dell VxRail footprints, and architecting Amazon EKS target states

The problem

A European enterprise IT infrastructure and network monitoring software leader operated its core commercial platforms, continuous integration runner fleets, and extensive QA test farms across on-premises Dell VxRail clusters running VMware Tanzu. Facing impending hypervisor licensing price increases and substantial physical colocation datacenter lease overheads, the organization initiated an AWS Migration Acceleration Program (MAP) assessment. The initiative required deep container-level discovery, VPC CNI IP capacity planning, stateful data persistence mapping, and an audited 3-year TCO financial justification to validate a complete datacenter exit.

The architectural solution

Serving as Lead Cloud Architect, led the technical workload assessment and EKS target state architecture. Built a 33-question evaluation matrix spanning container resource requests/limits, network policies, and pod storage drivers. Designed the target AWS platform transitioning VMware Tanzu workloads to Amazon EKS using Karpenter with AWS Graviton and Spot instances, mapped relational databases to Amazon Aurora, and authored the compute right-sizing report (projecting ≥ 25% compute savings) and official AWS MAP Customer Sign-Off package.

VMware Tanzu to Amazon EKS migration assessment pipeline
  1. 01 On-premise Tanzu & VxRail discovery Analyzing Dell VxRail hyperconverged clusters, VMware Tanzu worker nodes, persistent volume claims, and Fiber Channel SAN storage.
  2. 02 Kubernetes architectural gap analysis Evaluating VPC CNI subnet IP capacity, IAM Roles for Service Accounts (IRSA), Velero cluster backup SLAs, and container security scanning.
  3. 03 Target Amazon EKS architecture design Designing multi-AZ VPC infrastructure, Karpenter-managed node provisioning on Graviton3/Spot instances, and managed AWS data services.
  4. 04 TCO modeling & MAP customer sign-off Calculating VMware licensing cost avoidance, colocation datacenter lease elimination, and delivering executive business case deliverables.
What this enables: Decouples the enterprise from restrictive on-premises hypervisor licensing, automates container autoscaling via Karpenter on modern Graviton processors, and establishes the plan for retiring the colocation datacenter cleanly.
Assessment

Overcoming hypervisor licensing pressure with cloud-native Kubernetes

Enterprise software providers maintaining on-premises hyperconverged infrastructure face severe economic and operational pressure: escalating virtualization licensing fees, physical hardware maintenance cycles (Dell servers, Fiber Channel SANs), and inflexible compute capacity that limits continuous integration (CI) testing throughput.

As Lead Cloud Architect for this AWS Migration Acceleration Program (MAP) Assess engagement, the mission was to lead the technical discovery of the client's on-premises environment across their European headquarters and colocation datacenters, and architect a modern, cost-optimized target state on AWS centered on Amazon EKS.

Implementation notes
  • Kubernetes assessment framework: To address gaps in standard hypervisor discovery, an in-depth Kubernetes assessment questionnaire was established spanning 33 architectural dimensions, covering pod resource requests and limits, ingress controllers, network policy enforcement, and Prometheus metrics retention.
  • VPC CNI IP capacity planning: Evaluated AWS VPC CNI behavior where secondary private IPs are assigned directly to pods. Designed secondary CIDR blocks (100.64.0.0/16) for pod networking to prevent private IPv4 address exhaustion in production subnets.
  • Dynamic autoscaling with Karpenter: Modeled replacing static on-premise Dell VxRail worker nodes with Amazon EKS using Karpenter. By combining Graviton (ARM64) for baseline microservices with auto-scaling EC2 Spot instances for ephemeral GitLab CI runners and QA probe test farms, the architecture projected over 25% compute cost savings.
  • Persistent storage replatforming: Analyzed stateful container workloads backed by Fiber Channel SAN and NFS shares. Defined clear replatforming pathways: moving transactional relational databases to Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL, shared developer file storage to Amazon EFS and FSx for Windows, and backup repositories to AWS Backup with automated S3 lifecycle tiering.
Architecture

Current state vs. target Amazon EKS platform

The target state architecture transitioned physical hyperconverged hardware and self-managed Kubernetes into managed cloud-native AWS primitives:

  • Compute & Orchestration:
  • Current State: VMware Tanzu Kubernetes running across 4 Dell VxRail ESXi physical hosts with static CI runner fleets.
  • Target State: Amazon EKS (Multi-AZ) with Karpenter just-in-time node provisioning, using AWS Graviton3 (ARM64) for baseline microservices and auto-scaling EC2 Spot instances for ephemeral CI/CD runners.
  • Relational Databases & Persistent Storage:
  • Current State: Self-managed PostgreSQL and BI reporting databases residing on physical Fiber Channel SAN arrays.
  • Target State: Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL Multi-AZ with automated storage autoscaling and cross-AZ read replica offloading.
  • Shared File Storage & Backup Repositories:
  • Current State: On-premises Windows SMB shares and Veeam NFS backup storage targets.
  • Target State: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server, Amazon EFS, and AWS Backup with automated lifecycle transitions to Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive.
FinOps & TCO

Quantifying VMware cost avoidance and datacenter exit

The financial business case evaluated three core economic drivers:

  1. VMware Licensing Cost Avoidance: Transitioning from VMware Tanzu to managed Amazon EKS eliminated substantial annual hypervisor core licensing fees.
  2. Hardware Refresh Avoidance: Retiring Dell servers, rack storage, and SAN switches eliminated multi-million dollar capital expenditure (CapEx) hardware refresh commitments.
  3. Colocation Lease Elimination: Decommissioning the colocation facility eliminated recurring power, cooling, rack space, and dedicated physical transit costs.
Outcome

Official AWS MAP customer sign-off

The assessment concluded with the formal delivery of the Amazon EKS Target Architecture Blueprint, the Compute Right-Sizing & Savings Plans Report, and the AWS MAP Customer Sign-Off Template. The deliverables received executive approval from client leadership and AWS partner governance, clearing the gateway to begin the MAP Mobilize phase.

Questions about this case study?

Happy to go deeper on any part of this: the architecture, the trade-offs, or the decisions behind it.

anupojuprudhvi@gmail.com